Title |
Joint SNMMI–ASNC expert consensus document on the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in cardiac sarcoid detection and therapy monitoring
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12350-017-0978-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, Rob S Beanlands, Wengen Chen, Sharmila Dorbala, Edward J Miller, Venkatesh L Murthy, David H Birnie, Edward S Chen, Leslie T Cooper, Roderick H Tung, Eric S White, Salvador Borges-Neto, Marcelo F Di Carli, Robert J Gropler, Terrence D Ruddy, Thomas H Schindler, Ron Blankstein |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 14 | 52% |
Mexico | 1 | 4% |
Georgia | 1 | 4% |
Israel | 1 | 4% |
Uruguay | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 41% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 37% |
Scientists | 4 | 15% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 15 | 17% |
Researcher | 13 | 15% |
Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
Professor | 5 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 19% |
Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 52% |
Engineering | 4 | 5% |
Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#836,711
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#20
of 2,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,318
of 334,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.