↓ Skip to main content

Extracellular electron transfer in acetogenic bacteria and its application for conversion of carbon dioxide into organic compounds

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Extracellular electron transfer in acetogenic bacteria and its application for conversion of carbon dioxide into organic compounds
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00253-017-8421-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kensuke Igarashi, Souichiro Kato

Abstract

Acetogenic bacteria (i.e., acetogens) produce acetate from CO2 during anaerobic chemoautotrophic growth. Because acetogens fix CO2 with high energy efficiency, they have been investigated as biocatalysts of CO2 conversion into valuable chemicals. Recent studies revealed that some acetogens are capable of extracellular electron transfer (EET), which enables electron exchange between microbial cells and extracellular solid materials. Thus, acetogens are promising candidates as biocatalysts in recently developed bioelectrochemical technologies, including microbial electrosynthesis (MES), in which useful chemicals are biologically produced from CO2 using electricity as the energy source. In microbial photoelectrosynthesis, a variant of MES technology, the conversion of CO2 into organic compounds is achieved using light as the sole energy source without an external power supply. In this mini-review, we introduce the general features of bioproduction and EET of acetogens and describe recent progress and future prospects of MES technologies based on the EET capability of acetogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 22%
Student > Master 22 22%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 25 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Engineering 10 10%
Chemical Engineering 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,480,940
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#2,515
of 8,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,558
of 320,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#23
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,034 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.