↓ Skip to main content

Bipolar Disorder and Alcohol Use Disorder: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
Title
Bipolar Disorder and Alcohol Use Disorder: A Review
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11920-012-0320-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Conor K. Farren, Kevin P. Hill, Roger D. Weiss

Abstract

Bipolar disorder and alcohol use disorder represent a significant comorbid population, which is significantly worse than either diagnosis alone in presentation, duration, co-morbidity, cost, suicide rate, and poor response to treatment. They share some common characteristics in relation to genetic background, neuroimaging findings, and some biochemical findings. They can be treated with separate care, or ideally some form of integrated care. There are a number of pharmacotherapy trials, and psychotherapy trials that can aid program development. Post-treatment prognosis can be influenced by a number of factors including early abstinence, baseline low anxiety, engagement with an aftercare program and female gender. The future development of novel therapies relies upon increased psychiatric and medical awareness of the co-morbidity, and further research into novel therapies for the comorbid group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 139 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Master 16 11%
Other 13 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 30 21%
Unknown 37 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 27%
Psychology 33 23%
Neuroscience 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 40 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,235,654
of 25,186,033 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#147
of 1,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,887
of 176,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,186,033 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.