↓ Skip to main content

Fruit Fate, Seed Germination and Growth of an Invasive Vine – an Experimental Test of ‘sit and Wait’ Strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Fruit Fate, Seed Germination and Growth of an Invasive Vine – an Experimental Test of ‘sit and Wait’ Strategy
Published in
Biological Invasions, December 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1015857721486
Authors

Cathryn H. Greenberg, Lindsay M. Smith, Douglas J. Levey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 86 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Student > Master 17 19%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 56%
Environmental Science 20 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,306
of 2,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,690
of 132,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.