↓ Skip to main content

A National Study of Veterans Treatment Court Participants: Who Benefits and Who Recidivates

Overview of attention for article published in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
A National Study of Veterans Treatment Court Participants: Who Benefits and Who Recidivates
Published in
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10488-017-0816-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jack Tsai, Andrea Finlay, Bessie Flatley, Wesley J. Kasprow, Sean Clark

Abstract

Although there are now over 400 veterans treatment courts (VTCs) in the country, there have been few studies on participant outcomes in functional domains. Using national data on 7931 veterans in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Justice Outreach program across 115 VA sites who entered a VTC from 2011 to 2015, we examined the housing, employment, income, and criminal justice outcomes of VTC participants; and identified veteran characteristics predictive of outcomes. VTC participants spent an average of nearly a year in the program and 14% experienced a new incarceration. From program admission to exit, 10% more participants were in their own housing, 12% more were receiving VA benefits, but only 1% more were employed. Controlling for background characteristics, a history of incarceration predicted poor criminal justice, housing, and employment outcomes. Participants with property offenses or probation/parole violations and those with substance use disorders were more likely to experience a new incarceration. Participants with more mental health problems were more likely to be receiving VA benefits and less likely to be employed at program exit. Together, these findings highlight the importance of proper substance abuse treatment as well as employment services for VTC participants so that they can benefit from the diversion process.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 20 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 25%
Social Sciences 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 20 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,110,993
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#70
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,415
of 316,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.