↓ Skip to main content

Maximum intensity breast diffusion MRI for BI-RADS 4 lesions detected on X-ray mammography

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Radiology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Maximum intensity breast diffusion MRI for BI-RADS 4 lesions detected on X-ray mammography
Published in
Clinical Radiology, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2017.05.017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To investigate an abbreviated, contrast-agent free diffusion-weighted (DW) breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocol that provides a single image for the radiologist to read in order to non-invasively examine Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 lesions detected using breast cancer screening X-ray mammography. This retrospective evaluation within a institutional review board-approved, prospective study included 115 women (mean 57 years, range 50-69 years) with BI-RADS 4 findings on X-ray mammography and indication for biopsy over a period of 15 months. Full diagnostic breast MRI (FDP) was performed prior to biopsy (1.5 T). Maximum intensity breast diffusion (MIBD) images were generated from DW images (b = 1,500 mm/s(2), 3 mm section thickness) of the breast. MIBD and T2-weighted (T2W) images were read by two radiologists and compared to the diagnostic accuracy of an expert reading of the FDP with histopathology as the reference standard. The acquisition time of MIBD and T2W MRI was about 7 minutes. MIBD MRI provided a diagnostic accuracy of 87.93% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80.58-93.24%) for R1 and 89.66% (95% CI: 82.63-94.54%) for R2. Expert reading of the FDP revealed a similar accuracy of 86.2% (95% CI: 78.67-91.43%). The positive predictive value (PPV) could be increased from 36.2% (95% CI: 28.02-45.28; X-ray mammography alone) to a mean PPV of 80.89% (R1 79.17%, R2 82.16%) using MIBD MRI. Mean reading time was 30 seconds (25%/75 percentile 24.5-41.25). MIBD MRI might be of supplemental value if added to the work-up of BI-RADS 4 X-ray mammography screening findings. MIBD MRI might help reduce the false-positive rate prior to biopsy for reference lesions at only limited expense of measurement and reading time.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Radiology
#1,769
of 2,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,580
of 326,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Radiology
#28
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,163 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.