| Title |
Association between tidal volume size, duration of ventilation, and sedation needs in patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-014-3318-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ary Serpa Neto, Fabienne D. Simonis, Carmen S. V. Barbas, Michelle Biehl, Rogier M. Determann, Jonathan Elmer, Gilberto Friedman, Ognjen Gajic, Joshua N. Goldstein, Janneke Horn, Nicole P. Juffermans, Rita Linko, Roselaine Pinheiro de Oliveira, Sugantha Sundar, Daniel Talmor, Esther K. Wolthuis, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Paolo Pelosi, Marcus J. Schultz |
| Abstract |
Mechanical ventilation with lower tidal volumes (≤6 ml/kg of predicted body weight, PBW) could benefit patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, tidal volume reduction could be associated with increased patient discomfort and sedation needs, and consequent longer duration of ventilation. The aim of this individual patient data meta-analysis was to assess the associations between tidal volume size, duration of mechanical ventilation, and sedation needs in patients without ARDS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 15% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 25% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 59% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,096,263
of 24,688,240 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,003
of 5,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,063
of 232,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,688,240 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.