Title |
Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, August 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00464-017-5722-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joseph C. Carmichael, Deborah S. Keller, Gabriele Baldini, Liliana Bordeianou, Eric Weiss, Lawrence Lee, Marylise Boutros, James McClane, Scott R. Steele, Liane S. Feldman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 6 | 33% |
United States | 2 | 11% |
Italy | 1 | 6% |
India | 1 | 6% |
South Africa | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 44% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 28% |
Scientists | 4 | 22% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 19 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 10% |
Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 20% |
Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 49% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | <1% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 37 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,363,046
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#268
of 6,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,180
of 317,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#11
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,096 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.