Purpose Vitamin D (VitD) deficiency is common in patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing allogeneic transplantation (alloSCT), but its prognostic relevance is unclear. Patients and Methods The impact of pretransplant VitD status on overall survival, relapse mortality, and nonrelapse mortality was investigated retrospectively in a cohort of 492 patients undergoing alloSCT at our center from 2002 to 2013. VitD deficiency was defined as a serum level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 < 20 ng/mL (equivalent to < 50 nM) before alloSCT and was assessed using accredited laboratory methods and a standard chemiluminescent immunoassay. Results were validated in an independent cohort of 398 patients diagnosed with myeloid malignancies. Results A total of 396 (80%) and 348 (87%) patients had VitD deficiency before alloSCT in the training and validation cohort, respectively. In the training cohort, VitD deficiency was significantly associated with inferior overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.78; P = .007) in multivariable analysis. This was due to a higher risk of relapse (HR, 1.96; P = .006) rather than nonrelapse mortality. A significant association of pretransplant VitD deficiency with higher relapse rates was observed only in patients diagnosed with myeloid (HR, 2.55; P = .014) but not with lymphatic diseases (HR, 1.60; P = .147). A similar impact of pretransplant VitD deficiency on relapse risk in myeloid diseases was also observed in an independent patient cohort (HR, 2.60; P = .017). Validation of the effect of VitD deficiency on relapse in patients with myeloid malignancies was successful. Conclusion Pretransplant VitD deficiency was associated with a higher risk of relapse in patients allografted for myeloid malignancies. Prospective studies on VitD status and correction of VitD deficiency in the setting of alloSCT are highly warranted.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2017.
All research outputs
#913,883
of 34,397,553 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#2,252
of 32,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,083
of 357,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#44
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,397,553 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
