↓ Skip to main content

Care Culture as a Meaning-Making Process

Overview of attention for article published in Qualitative Health Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Care Culture as a Meaning-Making Process
Published in
Qualitative Health Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1177/1049732312470760
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrik Rytterström, Mitra Unosson, Maria Arman

Abstract

Culture might offer significant insights into the circumstances under which mistreatment occurs. Our aim with this study was to understand and explore institutional mistreatment from a care culture perspective. We used a case study with a triangulating methodology. It involved 12 individual interviews, one focus group interview with four people, a 2-day field study, and a document study. The case was a mistreatment situation that had occurred in municipal care, in which residents had been locked in their rooms at night. Two different care cultures were identified that could give a richer contextual understanding of the motives behind the institutional mistreatment. The service culture was need-oriented and emphasized freedom in care provision. The motherhood culture was characterized by protection and safeguarding of the vulnerable residents. Both cultures showed traces of caring values, but when important caring values were absent, this created a seedbed for mistreatment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Lecturer 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 16%
Psychology 6 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 11 30%