You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A global analysis of Y-chromosomal haplotype diversity for 23 STR loci
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Forensic Science International: Genetics, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.04.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josephine Purps, Sabine Siegert, Sascha Willuweit, Marion Nagy, Cíntia Alves, Renato Salazar, Sheila M.T. Angustia, Lorna H. Santos, Katja Anslinger, Birgit Bayer, Qasim Ayub, Wei Wei, Yali Xue, Chris Tyler-Smith, Miriam Baeta Bafalluy, Begoña Martínez-Jarreta, Balazs Egyed, Beate Balitzki, Sibylle Tschumi, David Ballard, Denise Syndercombe Court, Xinia Barrantes, Gerhard Bäßler, Tina Wiest, Burkhard Berger, Harald Niederstätter, Walther Parson, Carey Davis, Bruce Budowle, Helen Burri, Urs Borer, Christoph Koller, Elizeu F. Carvalho, Patricia M. Domingues, Wafaa Takash Chamoun, Michael D. Coble, Carolyn R. Hill, Daniel Corach, Mariela Caputo, Maria E. D’Amato, Sean Davison, Ronny Decorte, Maarten H.D. Larmuseau, Claudio Ottoni, Olga Rickards, Di Lu, Chengtao Jiang, Tadeusz Dobosz, Anna Jonkisz, William E. Frank, Ivana Furac, Christian Gehrig, Vincent Castella, Branka Grskovic, Cordula Haas, Jana Wobst, Gavrilo Hadzic, Katja Drobnic, Katsuya Honda, Yiping Hou, Di Zhou, Yan Li, Shengping Hu, Shenglan Chen, Uta-Dorothee Immel, Rüdiger Lessig, Zlatko Jakovski, Tanja Ilievska, Anja E. Klann, Cristina Cano García, Peter de Knijff, Thirsa Kraaijenbrink, Aikaterini Kondili, Penelope Miniati, Maria Vouropoulou, Lejla Kovacevic, Damir Marjanovic, Iris Lindner, Issam Mansour, Mouayyad Al-Azem, Ansar El Andari, Miguel Marino, Sandra Furfuro, Laura Locarno, Pablo Martín, Gracia M. Luque, Antonio Alonso, Luís Souto Miranda, Helena Moreira, Natsuko Mizuno, Yasuki Iwashima, Rodrigo S. Moura Neto, Tatiana L.S. Nogueira, Rosane Silva, Marina Nastainczyk-Wulf, Jeanett Edelmann, Michael Kohl, Shengjie Nie, Xianping Wang, Baowen Cheng, Carolina Núñez, Marian Martínez de Pancorbo, Jill K. Olofsson, Niels Morling, Valerio Onofri, Adriano Tagliabracci, Horolma Pamjav, Antonia Volgyi, Gusztav Barany, Ryszard Pawlowski, Agnieszka Maciejewska, Susi Pelotti, Witold Pepinski, Monica Abreu-Glowacka, Christopher Phillips, Jorge Cárdenas, Danel Rey-Gonzalez, Antonio Salas, Francesca Brisighelli, Cristian Capelli, Ulises Toscanini, Andrea Piccinini, Marilidia Piglionica, Stefania L. Baldassarra, Rafal Ploski, Magdalena Konarzewska, Emila Jastrzebska, Carlo Robino, Antti Sajantila, Jukka U. Palo, Evelyn Guevara, Jazelyn Salvador, Maria Corazon De Ungria, Jae Joseph Russell Rodriguez, Ulrike Schmidt, Nicola Schlauderer, Pekka Saukko, Peter M. Schneider, Miriam Sirker, Kyoung-Jin Shin, Yu Na Oh, Iulia Skitsa, Alexandra Ampati, Tobi-Gail Smith, Lina Solis de Calvit, Vlastimil Stenzl, Thomas Capal, Andreas Tillmar, Helena Nilsson, Stefania Turrina, Domenico De Leo, Andrea Verzeletti, Venusia Cortellini, Jon H. Wetton, Gareth M. Gwynne, Mark A. Jobling, Martin R. Whittle, Denilce R. Sumita, Paulina Wolańska-Nowak, Rita Y.Y. Yong, Michael Krawczak, Michael Nothnagel, Lutz Roewer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 312 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 54 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 6% |
| Other | 76 | 24% |
| Unknown | 68 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 114 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 7% |
| Unknown | 77 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#6,725,788
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Forensic Science International: Genetics
#361
of 1,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,901
of 244,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Forensic Science International: Genetics
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.