| Title |
Nanoethics, Science Communication, and a Fourth Model for Public Engagement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NanoEthics, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11569-017-0302-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andy Miah |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 38% |
| United States | 8 | 24% |
| Ghana | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 68% |
| Scientists | 11 | 32% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 18 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,686,989
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from NanoEthics
#9
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,180
of 331,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NanoEthics
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.