| Title |
Pollination biology of Disanthus cercidifolius var. longipes, an endemic and endangered plant in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biologia, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2478/s11756-009-0122-7 |
| Authors |
Yi-An Xiao, Bijoy Neog, Yong-Hong Xiao, Xiao-Hong Li, Jin-Chun Liu, Ping He |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 7% |
| Energy | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,537,059
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Biologia
#76
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,262
of 96,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologia
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,260 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.