↓ Skip to main content

Artemisinin Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
2813 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1119 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Artemisinin Resistance in Plasmodium falciparum Malaria
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, July 2009
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa0808859
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arjen M Dondorp, François Nosten, Poravuth Yi, Debashish Das, Aung Phae Phyo, Joel Tarning, Khin Maung Lwin, Frederic Ariey, Warunee Hanpithakpong, Sue J Lee, Pascal Ringwald, Kamolrat Silamut, Mallika Imwong, Kesinee Chotivanich, Pharath Lim, Trent Herdman, Sen Sam An, Shunmay Yeung, Pratap Singhasivanon, Nicholas P J Day, Niklas Lindegardh, Duong Socheat, Nicholas J White

Abstract

Artemisinin-based combination therapies are the recommended first-line treatments of falciparum malaria in all countries with endemic disease. There are recent concerns that the efficacy of such therapies has declined on the Thai-Cambodian border, historically a site of emerging antimalarial-drug resistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 10 <1%
United States 5 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 1086 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 223 20%
Student > Master 172 15%
Researcher 146 13%
Student > Bachelor 142 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 5%
Other 174 16%
Unknown 209 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 223 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 192 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 143 13%
Chemistry 99 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 50 4%
Other 160 14%
Unknown 252 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 418. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#64,705
of 24,287,697 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,973
of 31,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114
of 114,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#7
of 187 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,287,697 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 187 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.