↓ Skip to main content

A questionnaire for multinational case–control studies of environmental risk factors in multiple sclerosis (EnvIMS‐Q)

Overview of attention for article published in Acta neurologica Scandinavica Supplementum, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 151)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A questionnaire for multinational case–control studies of environmental risk factors in multiple sclerosis (EnvIMS‐Q)
Published in
Acta neurologica Scandinavica Supplementum, December 2012
DOI 10.1111/ane.12032
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Pugliatti, I. Casetta, J. Drulovic, E. Granieri, T. Holmøy, M. T. Kampman, A.‐M. Landtblom, K. Lauer, K.‐M. Myhr, M. Parpinel, T. Pekmezovic, T. Riise, B. Zhu, C. Wolfson

Abstract

The increasing incidence of multiple sclerosis (MS) worldwide, especially in women, points to the crucial role of environmental and lifestyle risk factors in determining the disease occurrence. An international multicentre case-control study of Environmental Risk Factors In Multiple Sclerosis (EnvIMS) has been launched in Norway, Sweden, Italy, Serbia and Canada, aimed to examine MS environmental risk factors in a large study population and disclose reciprocal interactions. To ensure equivalent methodology in detecting age-related past exposures in individuals with and without MS across the study sites, a new questionnaire (EnvIMS-Q) is presented.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 20%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Professor 4 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 25 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2018.
All research outputs
#7,959,659
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Acta neurologica Scandinavica Supplementum
#46
of 151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,476
of 288,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta neurologica Scandinavica Supplementum
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.