Title |
Usefulness of a clinical diagnosis of ICU-acquired paresis to predict outcome in patients with SIRS and acute respiratory failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00134-009-1645-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anna-Giulia Brunello, Matthias Haenggi, Oliver Wigger, Francesca Porta, Jukka Takala, Stephan M. Jakob |
Abstract |
Neuromuscular abnormalities are common in ICU patients. We aimed to assess the incidence of clinically diagnosed ICU-acquired paresis (ICUAP) and its impact on outcome. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Iceland | 1 | 1% |
Russia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 90 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 14% |
Researcher | 12 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Other | 17 | 18% |
Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Unknown | 27 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2010.
All research outputs
#15,233,109
of 22,649,029 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,990
of 4,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,663
of 80,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,649,029 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.