| Title |
A stakeholder analysis of the perceived outcomes of developing and implementing England’s obesity strategy 2008–2011
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-14-441 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Corinna Hawkes, Amy L Ahern, Susan A Jebb |
| Abstract |
International recommendations urge governments to implement population-based strategies to reduce the burden of obesity. This study assesses the development and implementation of the obesity strategy in England 2008-2011, Healthy Weight, Healthy Lives (HWHL). The aim was to identify if stakeholders perceived HWHL to have made any difference to the action to address obesity in England, with the ultimate objective of identifying insights that could inform the development and implementation of future obesity strategies in England and elsewhere. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 38% |
| Australia | 5 | 16% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 41% |
| Members of the public | 11 | 34% |
| Scientists | 7 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,758,252
of 24,291,750 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,958
of 16,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,763
of 231,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#37
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,291,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.