↓ Skip to main content

Chemical Composition and Nutritional Value of Unripe Banana Flour (Musa acuminata, var. Nanicão)

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 744)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Chemical Composition and Nutritional Value of Unripe Banana Flour (Musa acuminata, var. Nanicão)
Published in
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11130-011-0238-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabete Wenzel Menezes, Carmen Cecília Tadini, Tatiana Beatris Tribess, Angela Zuleta, Julieta Binaghi, Nelly Pak, Gloria Vera, Milana Cara Tanasov Dan, Andréa C. Bertolini, Beatriz Rosana Cordenunsi, Franco M. Lajolo

Abstract

Banana flour obtained from unripe banana (Musa acuminata, var. Nanicão) under specific drying conditions was evaluated regarding its chemical composition and nutritional value. Results are expressed in dry weight (dw). The unripe banana flour (UBF) presented a high amount of total dietary fiber (DF) (56.24 g/100 g), which consisted of resistant starch (RS) (48.99 g/100 g), fructans (0.05 g/100 g) and DF without RS or fructans (7.2 g/100 g). The contents of available starch (AS) (27.78 g/100 g) and soluble sugars (1.81 g/100 g) were low. The main phytosterols found were campesterol (4.1 mg/100 g), stigmasterol (2.5 mg/100 g) and β-sitosterol (6.2 mg/100 g). The total polyphenol content was 50.65 mg GAE/100 g. Antioxidant activity, by the FRAP and ORAC methods, was moderated, being 358.67 and 261.00 μmol of Trolox equivalent/100 g, respectively. The content of Zn, Ca and Fe and mineral dialyzability were low. The procedure used to obtain UBF resulted in the recovery of undamaged starch granules and in a low-energy product (597 kJ/100 g).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 232 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 16%
Student > Master 29 12%
Student > Postgraduate 15 6%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 42 18%
Unknown 85 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 26%
Engineering 21 9%
Chemistry 17 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 94 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#905,489
of 25,074,338 outputs
Outputs from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#32
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,335
of 121,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,074,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them