You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Solid Tumors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Anatomic Pathology, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1097/pap.0000000000000161 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shona Hendry, Roberto Salgado, Thomas Gevaert, Prudence A. Russell, Tom John, Bibhusal Thapa, Michael Christie, Koen van de Vijver, M.V. Estrada, Paula I. Gonzalez-Ericsson, Melinda Sanders, Benjamin Solomon, Cinzia Solinas, Gert G.G.M. Van den Eynden, Yves Allory, Matthias Preusser, Johannes Hainfellner, Giancarlo Pruneri, Andrea Vingiani, Sandra Demaria, Fraser Symmans, Paolo Nuciforo, Laura Comerma, E.A. Thompson, Sunil Lakhani, Seong-Rim Kim, Stuart Schnitt, Cecile Colpaert, Christos Sotiriou, Stefan J. Scherer, Michail Ignatiadis, Sunil Badve, Robert H. Pierce, Giuseppe Viale, Nicolas Sirtaine, Frederique Penault-Llorca, Tomohagu Sugie, Susan Fineberg, Soonmyung Paik, Ashok Srinivasan, Andrea Richardson, Yihong Wang, Ewa Chmielik, Jane Brock, Douglas B. Johnson, Justin Balko, Stephan Wienert, Veerle Bossuyt, Stefan Michiels, Nils Ternes, Nicole Burchardi, Stephen J. Luen, Peter Savas, Frederick Klauschen, Peter H. Watson, Brad H. Nelson, Carmen Criscitiello, Sandra O’Toole, Denis Larsimont, Roland de Wind, Giuseppe Curigliano, Fabrice André, Magali Lacroix-Triki, Mark van de Vijver, Federico Rojo, Giuseppe Floris, Shahinaz Bedri, Joseph Sparano, David Rimm, Torsten Nielsen, Zuzana Kos, Stephen Hewitt, Baljit Singh, Gelareh Farshid, Sibylle Loibl, Kimberly H. Allison, Nadine Tung, Sylvia Adams, Karen Willard-Gallo, Hugo M. Horlings, Leena Gandhi, Andre Moreira, Fred Hirsch, Maria V. Dieci, Maria Urbanowicz, Iva Brcic, Konstanty Korski, Fabien Gaire, Hartmut Koeppen, Amy Lo, Jennifer Giltnane, Marlon C. Rebelatto, Keith E. Steele, Jiping Zha, Kenneth Emancipator, Jonathan W. Juco, Carsten Denkert, Jorge Reis-Filho, Sherene Loi, Stephen B. Fox |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 472 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 472 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 69 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 63 | 13% |
| Other | 38 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Other | 94 | 20% |
| Unknown | 139 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 181 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 16 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 9% |
| Unknown | 162 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,640,608
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Anatomic Pathology
#43
of 557 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,705
of 344,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Anatomic Pathology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 557 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them