↓ Skip to main content

<岡田孝先生・西岡孝明先生の退職記念号:化学データサイエンス>MS/MSフラグメンテーションの正規表現を用いた代謝物アノテーション

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computer Aided Chemistry, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
<岡田孝先生・西岡孝明先生の退職記念号:化学データサイエンス>MS/MSフラグメンテーションの正規表現を用いた代謝物アノテーション
Published in
Journal of Computer Aided Chemistry, January 2017
DOI 10.2751/jcac.18.24
Authors

松田 史生

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computer Aided Chemistry
#11
of 12 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#362,560
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computer Aided Chemistry
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.