↓ Skip to main content

Blockade of Autoantibody-Initiated Tissue Damage by Using Recombinant Fab Antibody Fragments against Pathogenic Autoantigen

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Pathology, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blockade of Autoantibody-Initiated Tissue Damage by Using Recombinant Fab Antibody Fragments against Pathogenic Autoantigen
Published in
American Journal of Pathology, December 2009
DOI 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090744
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gang Wang, Hideyuki Ujiie, Akihiko Shibaki, Wataru Nishie, Yasuki Tateishi, Kazuhiro Kikuchi, Qiang Li, James R. McMillan, Hiroshi Morioka, Daisuke Sawamura, Hideki Nakamura, Hiroshi Shimizu

Abstract

Activation of the complement cascade via the classical pathway is required for the development of tissue injury in many autoantibody-mediated diseases. It therefore makes sense to block the pathological action of autoantibodies by preventing complement activation through inhibition of autoantibody binding to the corresponding pathogenic autoantigen using targeted Fab antibody fragments. To achieve this, we use bullous pemphigoid (BP) as an example of a typical autoimmune disease. Recombinant Fabs against the non-collagenous 16th-A domain of type XVII collagen, the main pathogenic epitope for autoantibodies in BP, were generated from antibody repertoires of BP patients by phage display. Two Fabs, Fab-B4 and Fab-19, showed marked ability to inhibit the binding of BP autoantibodies and subsequent complement activation in vitro. In the in vivo experiments using type XVII collagen humanized BP model mice, these Fabs protected mice against BP autoantibody-induced blistering disease. Thus, the blocking of pathogenic epitopes using engineered Fabs appears to demonstrate efficacy and may lead to disease-specific treatments for antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Pathology
#1,953
of 5,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,347
of 172,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Pathology
#22
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,664 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.