| Title |
Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-008-1205-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald E. G. Griesdale, T. Laine Bosma, Tobias Kurth, George Isac, Dean R. Chittock |
| Abstract |
Assess the risk of complications during endotracheal intubation (ETI) and their association with the skill level of the intubating physician. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 260 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Researcher | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 67 | 24% |
| Unknown | 56 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 167 | 61% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Unknown | 64 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,366,341
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,655
of 4,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,644
of 81,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#2
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.