↓ Skip to main content

Can lesions to the motor cortex induce amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Can lesions to the motor cortex induce amyotrophic lateral sclerosis?
Published in
Journal of Neurology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00415-013-7185-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Rosenbohm, Jan Kassubek, Patrick Weydt, Nicolai Marroquin, Alexander E. Volk, Christian Kubisch, Hans-Jürgen Huppertz, Markus Weber, Peter M. Andersen, Jochen H. Weishaupt, Albert C. Ludolph, The ALS Schwaben Register Group

Abstract

A recent staging effort for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has demonstrated that the TDP-43 neuropathology may initiate focally in the motor cortex in the majority of patients. We searched our data bank for patients with lesions of the motor cortex which preceded disease onset. We performed a search of our patient- and MRI-data bank and screened 1,835 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis for frontal lobe/motor cortex lesions. We found 18 patients with definite ALS who had documented and defined lesions of the motor cortex, which preceded the initial ALS symptoms by 8-42 years. In the vast majority (15/18) of the patients, the onset of ALS was closely related to the focal lesion since it started in a body region reflecting the damaged cortical area. The findings suggest that initial lesions to the motor cortex may be a contributing initiating factor in some patients with ALS or determine the site of onset in individuals pre-disposed to ALS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 63 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 11 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 30%
Neuroscience 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 20 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,508,296
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,581
of 4,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,647
of 303,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.