Title |
Substitution of physicians by nurses in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-214 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nahara Anani Martínez-González, Sima Djalali, Ryan Tandjung, Flore Huber-Geismann, Stefan Markun, Michel Wensing, Thomas Rosemann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 33 | 31% |
Canada | 8 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 6% |
United States | 5 | 5% |
Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
France | 2 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 48 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 88 | 81% |
Scientists | 15 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 309 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 62 | 20% |
Researcher | 44 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 8% |
Other | 61 | 19% |
Unknown | 65 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 90 | 29% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 23% |
Social Sciences | 20 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 3% |
Other | 41 | 13% |
Unknown | 70 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#416,379
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#66
of 8,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,522
of 242,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#2
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.