↓ Skip to main content

Achieving Stable Mainstream Nitrogen Removal via the Nitrite Pathway by Sludge Treatment Using Free Ammonia

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Achieving Stable Mainstream Nitrogen Removal via the Nitrite Pathway by Sludge Treatment Using Free Ammonia
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, August 2017
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.7b02776
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qilin Wang, Haoran Duan, Wei Wei, Bing-Jie Ni, Andrew Laloo, Zhiguo Yuan

Abstract

Biological nitrogen removal through the nitrite pathway (NH4+→NO2-→N2) is favorable for the wastewater treatment plants without sufficient carbon source. This study demonstrates an innovative approach for attaining the nitrite pathway based on sludge treatment using free ammonia (FA i.e. NH3). This approach is based on our innovative discovery in this study that FA at 210 mg NH3-N/L is far less biocidal to ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB) than to nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB). Twenty-two percent of the activated sludge from the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) receiving synthetic domestic wastewater was treated in an FA treatment unit at 210 mg NH3-N/L for one day. The FA treated sludge was afterwards recirculated back to the SBR. A nitrite accumulation ratio of above 90% was quickly achieved (in 40 d) and maintained stable in the SBR, indicating the establishment of the nitrite pathway. The NOB population and activity after implementing FA treatment was less than 5% of those without FA treatment, suggesting the washout of NOB. In contrast, the AOB population and activity in the SBR were not affected. The nitrogen removal performance was significantly improved after incorporating the FA approach. The FA approach is a closed-loop approach and is economically and environmentally attractive.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 12%
Student > Master 8 9%
Researcher 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 33 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 18 20%
Engineering 14 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Chemical Engineering 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 44 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2017.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#16,836
of 20,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208,562
of 325,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#194
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.