| Title |
Prone ventilation reduces mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure and severe hypoxemia: systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-009-1748-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sachin Sud, Jan O. Friedrich, Paolo Taccone, Federico Polli, Neill K. J. Adhikari, Roberto Latini, Antonio Pesenti, Claude Guérin, Jordi Mancebo, Martha A. Q. Curley, Rafael Fernandez, Ming-Cheng Chan, Pascal Beuret, Gregor Voggenreiter, Maneesh Sud, Gianni Tognoni, Luciano Gattinoni |
| Abstract |
Prone position ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) improves oxygenation but not survival, except possibly when AHRF is severe. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Nepal | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 428 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 1% |
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Greece | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 396 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 56 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 53 | 12% |
| Researcher | 47 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 33 | 8% |
| Other | 126 | 29% |
| Unknown | 77 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 269 | 63% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 21 | 5% |
| Unknown | 80 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,108,406
of 24,615,420 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,651
of 5,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,215
of 173,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#7
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,615,420 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,282 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.