You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Echocardiographic Screening for Rheumatic Heart Disease in High and Low Risk Australian Children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.113.003495 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn Roberts, Graeme Maguire, Alex Brown, David Atkinson, Bo Reményi, Gavin Wheaton, Andrew Kelly, Raman K. Kumar, Jiunn-Yih Su, Jonathan R. Carapetis |
| Abstract |
Echocardiographic screening for rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is becoming more widespread, but screening studies to date have used different echocardiographic definitions. The World Heart Federation has recently published new criteria for the echocardiographic diagnosis of RHD. We aimed to establish the prevalence of RHD in high-risk Indigenous Australian children using these criteria and to compare the findings with a group of Australian children at low risk for RHD. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2014.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#18,508
of 21,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,446
of 235,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#126
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.