↓ Skip to main content

Healthcare-Associated Clostridium difficile Infections are Sustained by Disease from the Community

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Healthcare-Associated Clostridium difficile Infections are Sustained by Disease from the Community
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11538-017-0328-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angus McLure, Archie C. A. Clements, Martyn Kirk, Kathryn Glass

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infections (CDIs) are some of the most common hospital-associated infections worldwide. Approximately 5% of the general population is colonised with the pathogen, but most are protected from disease by normal intestinal flora or immune responses to toxins. We developed a stochastic compartmental model of CDI in hospitals that captures the condition of the host's gut flora and the role of adaptive immune responses. A novel, derivative-based method for sensitivity analysis of individual-level outcomes was developed and applied to the model. The model reproduced the observed incidence and recurrence rates for hospitals with high and moderate incidence of hospital-acquired CDI. In both scenarios, the reproduction number for within-hospital transmission was less than 1 (0.67 and 0.44, respectively), but the proportion colonised with C. difficile at discharge (7.3 and 6.1%, respectively) exceeded the proportion colonised at admission (5%). The transmission and prevalence of CDI were most sensitive to the average length of stay and the transmission rate of the pathogen. Recurrent infections were most strongly affected by the treatment success rate and the immune profile of patients. Transmission within hospitals is substantial and leads to a net export of colonised individuals to the broader community. However, within-hospital transmission alone is insufficient to sustain endemic conditions in hospitals without the constant importation of colonised individuals. Improved hygiene practices to reduce transmission from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals and reduced length of stay are most likely to reduce within-hospital transmission and infections; however, these interventions are likely to have a smaller effect on the probability of recurrence. Immunising inpatients against the toxins produced by C. difficile will reduce the incidence of CDI but may increase transmission.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 9%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 14%
Mathematics 2 9%
Decision Sciences 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,566,650
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#890
of 1,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,209
of 317,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,103 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.