↓ Skip to main content

Aerobic condition enhances bacteriostatic effects of silver nanoparticles in aquatic environment: an antimicrobial study on Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aerobic condition enhances bacteriostatic effects of silver nanoparticles in aquatic environment: an antimicrobial study on Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Published in
Scientific Reports, August 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-07989-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhaoyu Chen, Ping Yang, Zhiguo Yuan, Jianhua Guo

Abstract

The intensive applications of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) inevitably cause continuous release of such materials into environments, as a consequence posing potential risks to microbial communities in engineered or natural ecosystems. However, the magnitude of antibacterial capacity of nanoparticles is still inconclusive, owing to influential factors such as the size of nanoparticle, microbial species, or environmental conditions. To reveal whether the presence of air would alter AgNPs ecotoxicity, Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, a facultative denitrifying bacterium and an opportunity pathogen, was used to study antibacterial assays under both anaerobic and aerobic conditions. The results indicate that the respiration status of P. aeruginosa affect the ecotoxicity of AgNPs. P. aeruginosa cultured under aerobic condition were more susceptible to AgNPs than that under anaerobic condition. Aerobic condition greatly enhanced bacteriostatic effects of AgNPs but not their bactericidal effects, as the ratio of viable but nonculturable (VBNC) bacteria remained above 90% when 5 mg L(-1) AgNPs applied. Our findings offer further understanding for the degree of toxicity of nanoparticles on microbial ecosystems and underscore the importance of exposure condition (e.g. oxygen) in the mode of action of AgNPs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 24%
Student > Master 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 17%
Materials Science 7 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Chemical Engineering 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 6 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2017.
All research outputs
#14,950,579
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#72,892
of 124,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,206
of 317,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#3,310
of 6,035 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,035 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.