↓ Skip to main content

The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, March 2017
DOI 10.1245/s10434-017-5833-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yara L. Basta, Sifra Bolle, Paul Fockens, Kristien M. A. J. Tytgat

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 107 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 17%
Researcher 12 11%
Other 12 11%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 32 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Psychology 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 37 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2017.
All research outputs
#5,344,805
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,668
of 7,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,536
of 325,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#16
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.