↓ Skip to main content

Using needle orientation sensing as surrogate signal for respiratory motion estimation in percutaneous interventions

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Using needle orientation sensing as surrogate signal for respiratory motion estimation in percutaneous interventions
Published in
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11548-017-1644-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Momen Abayazid, Takahisa Kato, Stuart G. Silverman, Nobuhiko Hata

Abstract

To develop and evaluate an approach to estimate the respiratory-induced motion of lesions in the chest and abdomen. The proposed approach uses the motion of an initial reference needle inserted into a moving organ to estimate the lesion (target) displacement that is caused by respiration. The needles position is measured using an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor externally attached to the hub of an initially placed reference needle. Data obtained from the IMU sensor and the target motion are used to train a learning-based approach to estimate the position of the moving target. An experimental platform was designed to mimic respiratory motion of the liver. Liver motion profiles of human subjects provided inputs to the experimental platform. Variables including the insertion angle, target depth, target motion velocity and target proximity to the reference needle were evaluated by measuring the error of the estimated target position and processing time. The mean error of estimation of the target position ranged between 0.86 and 1.29 mm. The processing maximum training and testing time was 5 ms which is suitable for real-time target motion estimation using the needle position sensor. The external motion of an initially placed reference needle inserted into a moving organ can be used as a surrogate, measurable and accessible signal to estimate in real-time the position of a moving target caused by respiration; this technique could then be used to guide the placement of subsequently inserted needles directly into the target.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 21%
Computer Science 4 9%
Chemistry 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,474,679
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#502
of 856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,357
of 317,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
#12
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 856 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.