| Title |
Automatic referral to standardize palliative care access: an international Delphi survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00520-017-3830-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Hui, Masanori Mori, Yee-Choon Meng, Sharon M. Watanabe, Augusto Caraceni, Florian Strasser, Tiina Saarto, Nathan Cherny, Paul Glare, Stein Kaasa, Eduardo Bruera |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 19% |
| Spain | 4 | 7% |
| Mexico | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 29% |
| Scientists | 6 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2023.
All research outputs
#944,243
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#76
of 5,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,920
of 326,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.