You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Daily co-trimoxazole prophylaxis in severely immunosuppressed HIV-infected adults in Africa started on combination antiretroviral therapy: an observational analysis of the DART cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60057-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
AS Walker, D Ford, CF Gilks, P Munderi, F Ssali, A Reid, E Katabira, H Grosskurth, P Mugyenyi, J Hakim, JH Darbyshire, DM Gibb, AG Babiker |
| Abstract |
Co-trimoxazole prophylaxis can reduce mortality from untreated HIV infection in Africa; whether benefits occur alongside combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) is unclear. We estimated the effect of prophylaxis after ART initiation in adults. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 23% |
| Researcher | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 23% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 44% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,779,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#17,498
of 42,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,600
of 103,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#68
of 162 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 162 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.