| Title |
Polyphenol intake and mortality risk: a re-analysis of the PREDIMED trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-12-77 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Tresserra-Rimbau, Eric B Rimm, Alexander Medina-Remón, Miguel A Martínez-González, M Carmen López-Sabater, María I Covas, Dolores Corella, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Enrique Gómez-Gracia, José Lapetra, Fernando Arós, Miquel Fiol, Emili Ros, Lluis Serra-Majem, Xavier Pintó, Miguel A Muñoz, Alfredo Gea, Valentina Ruiz-Gutiérrez, Ramón Estruch, Rosa M Lamuela-Raventós |
| Abstract |
Polyphenols may lower the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other chronic diseases due to their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, as well as their beneficial effects on blood pressure, lipids and insulin resistance. However, no previous epidemiological studies have evaluated the relationship between the intake of total polyphenols intake and polyphenol subclasses with overall mortality. Our aim was to evaluate whether polyphenol intake is associated with all-cause mortality in subjects at high cardiovascular risk. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 24% |
| Spain | 3 | 18% |
| Australia | 2 | 12% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 24% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 321 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 314 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 13% |
| Researcher | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 58 | 18% |
| Unknown | 63 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 36 | 11% |
| Unknown | 80 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 164. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#215,113
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#187
of 3,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,854
of 228,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#4
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.