| Title |
Effects of Disodium Fumarate on In Vitro Rumen Fermentation, The Production of Lipopolysaccharide and Biogenic Amines, and The Rumen Bacterial Community
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Current Microbiology, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00284-017-1322-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wei Jin, Chunxu Xue, Junhua Liu, Yuyang Yin, Weiyun Zhu, Shengyong Mao |
| Abstract |
The effect of disodium fumarate (DF) on the ruminal fermentation profiles, the accumulation of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and bioamines, and the composition of the ruminal bacterial community was investigated by in vitro rumen fermentation. The addition of DF increased the total gas production; the concentrations of propionate, valerate, total volatile fatty acids, and ammonia-nitrogen; and the rumen pH after a 24 h fermentation. By contrast, DF addition decreased the ratio of acetate to propionate and the concentrations of lactate, lipopolysaccharide, methylamine, tryptamine, putrescine, histamine, and tyramine (P < 0.05). Principal coordinates analysis and molecular variance analysis showed that DF altered the ruminal bacterial community (P < 0.05). At the phylum level, DF decreased the proportion of Proteobacteria, and increased the proportions of Spirochaetae and Elusimicrobia (P < 0.05). At the genus level, DF decreased the percentage of Ruminobacter, while increasing the percentage of Succinivibrio and Treponema (P < 0.05). Overall, the results indicate that DF modified rumen fermentation and mitigated the production of several toxic compounds. Thus, DF has great potential for preventing subacute rumen acidosis in dairy cows and for improving the health of ruminants. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 25% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2018.
All research outputs
#3,386,750
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Current Microbiology
#88
of 2,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,947
of 317,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Microbiology
#3
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,471 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.