↓ Skip to main content

Static and dynamic visual vertical perception in subjects with migraine and vestibular migraine

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Static and dynamic visual vertical perception in subjects with migraine and vestibular migraine
Published in
World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.wjorl.2016.08.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark A. Miller, Benjamin T. Crane

Abstract

To measure the static visual vertical and the effect of visual rotation on the perception of visual vertical in migraine and vestibular migraine subjects. By so doing, we may better understand the vestibular contribution to the pathophysiology of migraine, as well as the capacity for visual compensation. The perception of visual vertical in the presence of static and dynamic visual cues was prospectively studied in 10 subjects with migraine, 6 subjects with vestibular migraines, and 10 controls. Subjects used a dial to rotate a fluorescent green line to the vertical position. Static visual vertical (SVV) was measured with a black background, as well as with a static random-dot visual pattern. This pattern was then rotated at various velocities to measure dynamic visual vertical (DVV). Migraine subjects had greater deviation from true vertical than controls in SVV (P < 0.05). The DVV in migraine subjects was greater than controls when rotated in the counterclockwise at -5°/s (P < 0.01), -20°/s (P < 0.01), and -80°/s (P < 0.01), but not when the line was rotated clockwise. Vestibular migraine subjects did not deviate significantly from controls in SVV (P < 0.37, P < 0.22), but did show greater deviation in the DVV tasks at -80 and -20°/s (P < 0.05, P < 0.03). Migraine and vestibular migraine subjects demonstrated a wider range of vertical deviance when compared to controls (P < 0.02). This study demonstrates a significant deviation of the perceived static as well as dynamic visual vertical in migraine subjects. Moving stimuli may have a greater influence on migraine and vestibular migraine subjects, which suggests an underlying sensory integration disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 19%
Psychology 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2017.
All research outputs
#15,755,393
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
#65
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,186
of 348,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them