You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multivariate Analysis of Prognostic Factors Among 2,313 Patients With Stage III Melanoma: Comparison of Nodal Micrometastases Versus Macrometastases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Clinical Oncology, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1200/jco.2009.27.1627 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles M. Balch, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald, Seng-jaw Soong, John F. Thompson, Shouluan Ding, David R. Byrd, Natale Cascinelli, Alistair J. Cochran, Daniel G. Coit, Alexander M. Eggermont, Timothy Johnson, John M. Kirkwood, Stanley P. Leong, Kelly M. McMasters, Martin C. Mihm, Donald L. Morton, Merrick I. Ross, Vernon K. Sondak |
| Abstract |
To determine the survival rates and independent predictors of survival using a contemporary international cohort of patients with stage III melanoma. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 23 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 36 | 24% |
| Unknown | 33 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 88 | 58% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 39 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,414,665
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#7,398
of 22,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,015
of 102,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#52
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.