↓ Skip to main content

Alternative Treatment Modalities for the Hypogonadal Patient

Overview of attention for article published in Current Urology Reports, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Alternative Treatment Modalities for the Hypogonadal Patient
Published in
Current Urology Reports, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11934-014-0417-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Landon W. Trost, Mohit Khera

Abstract

Testosterone (T) deficiency syndrome (TDS) is a prevalent condition, commonly managed with exogenous T. Despite an abundance of T formulations, alternative treatments are often sought for various reasons. To evaluate outcomes of alternative therapies, a PubMed search was performed of all publications that included men with TDS from 1990 through October 2013, with results summarized. Proposed mechanisms of action were also reviewed to provide a pathophysiologic basis for reported outcomes. Nonpharmacologic therapies that increase endogenous T are weight loss, exercise, and varicocelectomy, while medications used off-label include aromatase inhibitors, human chorionic gonadotropin, and selective estrogen receptor modulators. All reported therapies increase T, while changes in estradiol and adverse events vary by therapeutic class. Although limited data preclude direct comparisons between therapies, exercise and weight loss alone or in combination with medications may be considered first line. The role for surgical therapy in TDS remains undefined and requires further study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Researcher 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 29%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 11%
Sports and Recreations 3 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 7 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,940,166
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Current Urology Reports
#250
of 586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,997
of 227,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Urology Reports
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.