↓ Skip to main content

Verletzungen der oberen Halswirbelsäule

Overview of attention for article published in Die Unfallchirurgie, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Verletzungen der oberen Halswirbelsäule
Published in
Die Unfallchirurgie, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00113-017-0380-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matti Scholz, Frank Kandziora, Frank Hildebrand, Philipp Kobbe

Abstract

Injuries to the upper cervical spine represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to the treating surgeon due to the complex anatomical relationships and biomechanical features. In this further education article the diagnostic principles, established classifications and therapeutic recommendations as well as injury-specific characteristics of bony and ligamentous injuries to the upper cervical spine (C0-C2) are presented.

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,264,793
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Die Unfallchirurgie
#73
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,626
of 327,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Die Unfallchirurgie
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.