| Title |
Gene flow and immigration: genetic diversity and population structure of lions (Panthera leo) in Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-014-0571-6 |
| Authors |
C. Morandin, A. J. Loveridge, G. Segelbacher, N. Elliot, H. Madzikanda, D. W. Macdonald, J. Höglund |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 50% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 43 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Energy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2015.
All research outputs
#6,134,638
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#373
of 1,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,811
of 307,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.