| Title |
An audit analysis of a guideline for the investigation and initial therapy of diarrhea negative (atypical) hemolytic uremic syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Nephrology, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00467-014-2817-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sally Johnson, Jelena Stojanovic, Gema Ariceta, Martin Bitzan, Nesrin Besbas, Michelle Frieling, Diana Karpman, Daniel Landau, Craig Langman, Christoph Licht, Carmine Pecoraro, Magdalena Riedl, Ekaterini Siomou, Nicole van de Kar, Johan Vande Walle, Chantal Loirat, C. Mark Taylor |
| Abstract |
In 2009, the European Paediatric Study Group for Haemolytic Uraemic Syndrome (HUS) published a clinical practice guideline for the investigation and initial therapy of diarrhea-negative HUS (now more widely referred to as atypical HUS, aHUS). The therapeutic component of the guideline (comprising early, high-volume plasmapheresis) was derived from anecdotal evidence and expert consensus, and the authors committed to auditing outcome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 27% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 44% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#15,300,431
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Nephrology
#2,714
of 3,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,703
of 227,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Nephrology
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.