| Title |
Considerations for Clinicians in the Diagnosis, Prevention, and Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Recommendations from a Multidisciplinary Expert ASBrS Panel
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, August 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-017-5982-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah A. McLaughlin, Alicia C. Staley, Frank Vicini, Paul Thiruchelvam, Nancy A. Hutchison, Jane Mendez, Fiona MacNeill, Stanley G. Rockson, Sarah M. DeSnyder, Suzanne Klimberg, Michael Alatriste, Francesco Boccardo, Mark L. Smith, Sheldon M. Feldman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 27% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 123 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 17% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 728. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2022.
All research outputs
#26,980
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3
of 7,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#513
of 322,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#3
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.