↓ Skip to main content

埼玉県東部地域における竜巻発生時受援側となった消防本部の活動報告

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 185)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
埼玉県東部地域における竜巻発生時受援側となった消防本部の活動報告
Published in
Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine, October 2015
DOI 10.11240/jsem.18.629
Authors

山田 浩二郎, 鈴木 明人, 山本 直之, 須賀 啓臣, 天野 尽, 茅野 俊幸, 杉本 一郎, 速水 広樹, 杉木 大輔, 池上 敬一

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,608,799
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#46
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,281
of 286,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society for Emergency Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them