| Title |
Effects of Massachusetts Health Reform on the Use of Clinical Preventive Services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-014-2865-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catherine A. Okoro, Satvinder S. Dhingra, Ralph J. Coates, Matthew Zack, Eduardo J. Simoes |
| Abstract |
Expansion of health insurance coverage, and hence clinical preventive services (CPS), provides an opportunity for improvements in the health of adults. The degree to which expansion of health insurance coverage affects the use of CPS is unknown. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 82 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 19% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Psychology | 7 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,508,275
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,887
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,680
of 231,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#12
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.