↓ Skip to main content

Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in Blood, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Melphalan and prednisone plus thalidomide or placebo in elderly patients with multiple myeloma
Published in
Blood, May 2010
DOI 10.1182/blood-2009-08-237974
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anders Waage, Peter Gimsing, Peter Fayers, Niels Abildgaard, Lucia Ahlberg, Bo Björkstrand, Kristina Carlson, Inger Marie Dahl, Karin Forsberg, Nina Gulbrandsen, Einar Haukås, Øyvind Hjertner, Martin Hjorth, Torbjörn Karlsson, Lene Meldgaard Knudsen, Johan Lanng Nielsen, Olle Linder, Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist, Ingerid Nesthus, Jürgen Rolke, Maria Strandberg, Jon Hjalmar Sørbø, Finn Wisløff, Gunnar Juliusson, Ingemar Turesson, for the Nordic Myeloma Study Group

Abstract

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 363 patients with untreated multiple myeloma were randomized to receive either melphalan-prednisone and thalidomide (MPT) or melphalan-prednisone and placebo (MP). The dose of melphalan was 0.25 mg/kg and prednisone was 100 mg given daily for 4 days every 6 weeks until plateau phase. The dose of thalidomide/placebo was escalated to 400 mg daily until plateau phase and thereafter reduced to 200 mg daily until progression. A total of 357 patients were analyzed. Partial response was 34% and 33%, and very good partial response or better was 23% and 7% in the MPT and MP arms, respectively (P < .001). There was no significant difference in progression-free or overall survival, with median survival being 29 months in the MPT arm and 32 months in the MP arm. Most quality of life outcomes improved equally in both arms, apart from constipation, which was markedly increased in the MPT arm. Constipation, neuropathy, nonneuropathy neurologic toxicity, and skin reactions were significantly more frequent in the MPT arm. The number of thromboembolic events was equal in the 2 treatment arms. In conclusion, MPT had a significant antimyeloma effect, but this did not translate into improved survival. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00218855.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 104 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 22%
Other 21 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Master 12 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 17 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 22 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,415,510
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Blood
#4,315
of 33,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,997
of 104,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood
#39
of 208 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 208 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.