↓ Skip to main content

The Implications of Brain Connectivity in the Neuropsychology of Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychology Review, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 453)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
Title
The Implications of Brain Connectivity in the Neuropsychology of Autism
Published in
Neuropsychology Review, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11065-014-9250-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose O. Maximo, Elyse J. Cadena, Rajesh K. Kana

Abstract

Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder that has been associated with atypical brain functioning. Functional connectivity MRI (fcMRI) studies examining neural networks in autism have seen an exponential rise over the last decade. Such investigations have led to the characterization of autism as a distributed neural systems disorder. Studies have found widespread cortical underconnectivity, local overconnectivity, and mixed results suggesting disrupted brain connectivity as a potential neural signature of autism. In this review, we summarize the findings of previous fcMRI studies in autism with a detailed examination of their methodology, in order to better understand its potential and to delineate the pitfalls. We also address how a multimodal neuroimaging approach (incorporating different measures of brain connectivity) may help characterize the complex neurobiology of autism at a global level. Finally, we also address the potential of neuroimaging-based markers in assisting neuropsychological assessment of autism. The quest for a neural marker for autism is still ongoing, yet new findings suggest that aberrant brain connectivity may be a promising candidate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Australia 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 374 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 19%
Student > Master 62 16%
Student > Bachelor 51 13%
Researcher 50 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 5%
Other 62 16%
Unknown 70 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 114 29%
Neuroscience 60 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 7%
Computer Science 10 3%
Other 49 13%
Unknown 91 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,221,423
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychology Review
#37
of 453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,070
of 307,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychology Review
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them