↓ Skip to main content

Remote monitoring of cardiorespiratory signals from a hovering unmanned aerial vehicle

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 837)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
Remote monitoring of cardiorespiratory signals from a hovering unmanned aerial vehicle
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12938-017-0395-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ali Al-Naji, Asanka G. Perera, Javaan Chahl

Abstract

Remote physiological measurement might be very useful for biomedical diagnostics and monitoring. This study presents an efficient method for remotely measuring heart rate and respiratory rate from video captured by a hovering unmanned aerial vehicle (UVA). The proposed method estimates heart rate and respiratory rate based on the acquired signals obtained from video-photoplethysmography that are synchronous with cardiorespiratory activity. Since the PPG signal is highly affected by the noise variations (illumination variations, subject's motions and camera movement), we have used advanced signal processing techniques, including complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to remove noise under these assumptions. To evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the proposed method, a set of experiments were performed on 15 healthy volunteers in a front-facing position involving motion resulting from both the subject and the UAV under different scenarios and different lighting conditions. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed system with and without the magnification process achieves robust and accurate readings and have significant correlations compared to a standard pulse oximeter and Piezo respiratory belt. Also, the squared correlation coefficient, root mean square error, and mean error rate yielded by the proposed method with and without the magnification process were significantly better than the state-of-the-art methodologies, including independent component analysis (ICA) and principal component analysis (PCA).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Master 15 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 25 28%
Computer Science 15 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#275,485
of 23,509,253 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#4
of 837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,561
of 318,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,253 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 837 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.