↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of chemical constituents among licorice, roasted licorice, and roasted licorice with honey

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Natural Medicines, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of chemical constituents among licorice, roasted licorice, and roasted licorice with honey
Published in
Journal of Natural Medicines, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11418-017-1115-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Misato Ota, Feng Xu, Yao-Li Li, Ming-Ying Shang, Toshiaki Makino, Shao-Qing Cai

Abstract

Licorice (root and rhizome of Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.) is sometimes used as crude drug after processing. In this report, we prepared roasted licorice with or without honey using 3 lots of crude drug samples derived from wild G. uralensis, and analyzed the constituents in unprocessed, roasted, and honey-roasted licorice samples by high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-ion trap-time of flight mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-IT-TOF-MS(n)) with principal component analysis. We found that the areas of 41 peaks were noticeably changed by processing. Among them, the areas of 12 peaks, viz. isoliquiritin, isoliquiritigenin, glucoisoliquiritin, 6″-O-acetylisoliquiritin, 6″-O-acetylisoliquiritin apioside, glycyrrhetinic acid 3-O-glucuronide, 5 kinds of sugar-derivatives and one compound whose molecular weight was 386 Da were increased by roasting in all 3 lots, and those peak areas were increased by higher heating temperatures. Among the increased peaks, 3 kinds of sugar-derivatives had larger areas, and 6″-O-acetylisoliquiritin had lower areas than those in honey-roasted licorice. Those sugar-derivatives were the only characteristics differing between honey-roasted licorice and roasted licorice. Meanwhile, the areas of 9 peaks, four of them identified as 6″-O-acetylliquiritin, 6″-O-acetylliquiritin apioside, formononetin and gancaonin L, were decreased by roasting in all 3 lots, but there were no differences between roasted licorice with or without honey. Those compounds whose amounts were changed by processing could be used as markers for the quality control of roasted and honey-roasted licorice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Professor 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 13%
Unspecified 1 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2017.
All research outputs
#20,441,465
of 22,996,001 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Natural Medicines
#397
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,934
of 317,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Natural Medicines
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,996,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,469 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.