| Title |
Evaluation of a structured goal planning and tailored follow-up programme in rehabilitation for patients with rheumatic diseases: protocol for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-153 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ingvild Kjeken, Gunnhild Berdal, Ingvild Bø, Turid Dager, Anne Dingsør, Jon Hagfors, Bente Hamnes, Siv G Eppeland, Elin Fjerstad, Petter Mowinckel, Merete Nielsen, Randi W Rørstad, Anne-Lene Sand-Svartrud, Bente Slungaard, Sigrid H Wigers, Kåre Birger Hagen |
| Abstract |
Comprehensive rehabilitation, involving health professionals from various disciplines, is widely used as an adjunct to pharmacological and surgical treatment in people with rheumatic diseases. However, the evidence for the clinical- and cost-effectiveness of such interventions is limited, and the majority of those who receive rehabilitation are back to their initial health status six to 12 months after discharge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 107 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 24 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 17% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2014.
All research outputs
#18,371,959
of 22,755,127 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,123
of 4,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,021
of 227,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#73
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,755,127 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.