↓ Skip to main content

Interscalene plexus block versus general anaesthesia for shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled study

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 935)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Interscalene plexus block versus general anaesthesia for shoulder surgery: a randomized controlled study
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, May 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00590-014-1483-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lars J. Lehmann, Gregor Loosen, Christel Weiss, Marc D. Schmittner

Abstract

This randomized clinical trial evaluates interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB), general anaesthesia (GA) and the combination of both anaesthetic methods (GA + ISB) in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 11 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,717,413
of 24,787,209 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#26
of 935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,784
of 232,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
#2
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,787,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 935 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.